Chartered Institute of Building Magazine of the Chartered Institute of Building

News

Work at height warning after tower scaffold collapse

28 July 2020

The Prefabricated Access Suppliers’ and Manufacturers’ Association (PASMA) has urged construction firms to properly plan work at height after a worker was hospitalised for two weeks when the tower scaffold he was using collapsed.

Glasgow Sheriff Court heard that on 2 September 2016, an employee of JR Scaffold Services Ltd, who was erecting a tower scaffold to carry out roof repairs, fell eight metres after the cantilever section on which he was standing collapsed.

It left him hospitalised for two weeks, with severe injuries including a collapsed lung, ruptured spleen and multiple rib and shoulder fractures. It was five months before he could return to work and he will be on daily antibiotics for the rest of his life.

A Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation found the company had correctly carried out a risk assessment and method statement before starting work. However, the tower was erected in the wrong place. Rather than dismantle and reassemble in the right place, it was decided that a cantilever section should be added, despite this not being included in the design.

The HSE identified two major errors in what followed. Firstly, there were insufficient anchor ties available on site, so the cantilever was supported by splicing the frame of the scaffold. Secondly, no ballast/counterweight was used, which meant the top section of the tower was unable to support the weight of the cantilever.

When the employee stood on the cantilever section to fit toe boards, the top section of the scaffold and cantilever section collapsed.

The company pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2 (1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and was fined £5,000, reduced from £10,000 due to the current pandemic.

PASMA urged all those responsible for managing the use of mobile towers and prefabricated tower scaffolds, to take all necessary measures to protect employees’ safety.

Dangers of unplanned modifications

It said the case highlighted the consequences of making unplanned modifications to scaffold towers, which compromises the stability of the tower and increases the risk of incident.

It said that when assembling a standard configuration tower, including mobile access and cantilever towers, the instruction manual should be followed exactly. And it called for more complex aluminium structures to be specially designed for a project, and built by a PASMA Hire & Assembly member.

The chair of PASMA’s Hire and Assembly Committee and owner of STS Access Ltd, Pete Harley said: “It is distressing to hear of another fall from height that could easily have been prevented. The incorrect positioning of the tower set off a chain of errors resulting in a serious injury. Alterations can be made to a designed structure only after consulting with the engineer and the correct equipment must always be used. This incident clearly highlights the need for planning by a competent person, as required by the Work at Height Regulations.”

Gillian Rutter, PASMA’s immediate past chairman and director of Hire Access Ltd added: “Cantilever towers are a proven safe method of working but only when they are correctly designed and built. There is a PASMA Towers with Cantilevers training course that gives already experienced mobile access tower users the additional skills required to build these more complex tower scaffolds. However, even this training does not qualify a user to design a cantilever tower. Without question, that is the role of a qualified designer whose design plan must be followed on site without changes.”

Comments

Begs the question why bother with RAMS if they are ignored. Money dictated this incident it would have been more expensive to take down and erect properly so a poor compromise failed.
Was an external Safety Consultant utilised to review performance?

Terence Warom, 28 July 2020

When did they last read H&S Regs

Sheila Anderson, 28 July 2020

Leave a Reply