Chartered Institute of Building Magazine of the Chartered Institute of Building

News

MMC elevates balcony blaze risk, insurer claims

16 July 2020
A fire at Samuel Garside House on De Pass Gardens in Barking in 2019 is believed to have started after a resident’s barbecue on a balcony

The use of modern methods of construction (MMC), including modular units, timber frames, and wooden balconies or cladding all elevate the risk of balcony fires.

That’s according to Zurich Insurance, which has warned that almost £9m of damage was caused last year by just four balcony blazes.

The insurer cited figures from the London Fire Brigade that there have been 550 such fires in London alone over the past three years. It paid out £210m for fire damage in 2019 – an increase of 48% since 2018.

Zurich said it decided to include modular pods or buildings in its list of factors that increase the risk of balcony fires because of the potential for internal fire spread within the structure “where there may be unforeseen weaknesses and vulnerabilities in fire stopping and fire compartmentation applicable to some modular technologies”.

It added that the interface and application of any cladding system, whether combustible or otherwise, where it is applied to the structure of the building can also present “the opportunity for rapid and unforeseen fire spread if not correctly specified, installed, or maintained”.

It warned that the majority of balcony fires start as a result of careless use of barbecues or discarded smoking materials. The risks are also increased by the fact that wind speeds are stronger at greater heights and can carry burning embers for up to one mile.

Official figures from London Fire Brigade show that in the last three years there have been 550 balcony fires in London alone.

Andy Dark, Fire Brigades Union assistant general secretary, said: “It’s clear from Zurich’s damning evidence that using any kind of barbecue on a balcony should be banned.

“Time and again, firefighters have fought fires in blocks of flats where the accidental source of ignition has been a barbecue used on a balcony.”

Zurich’s role in building safety shake-up

Zurich Insurance, which played a role in the Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety announced by Dame Judith Hackett following the Grenfell Tower tragedy said it has “repeatedly“ warned the government that the regulatory system covering high-rise and complex buildings is “not fit for purpose” and has called for a rethink of the whole system and how it works. This includes:

  • Extending the combustible cladding ban to the entire external height of all residential and non-residential buildings.
  • Introducing a property-safety building regulatory baseline to ensure that residents can not only escape but also have a home to return to.
  • Introducing a publicly available property database to ensure that property owners, the wider public, and Fire & Rescue Services understand how a property was constructed.
  • It has also echoed warnings by the London Fire Brigade of the dangers of balcony barbecues which are being “marketed carelessly”.

Comments

Just for clarity: there’s a lot of conditional-tense statements in this piece. Is Zurich saying that damage was caused because of modern or modular construction? Is Zurich actually pointing to evidence of “rapid and unforeseen fire spread if [products are] not correctly specified, installed, or maintained”.

Is Zurich actually advancing ANY evidence at all? Or is it simply saying there’s a risk?

Of course there’s a risk. It could be very simply and firmly addressed by simply inserting an exclusion clause in home/flat-owners’ buildings and contents insurance to the effect that there will be no pay-out in the event of damage arising from the use of a BBQ. As having adequate home insurance is a prerequisite for obtaining a mortgage, a powerful incentive can be quickly put into the market without having endless discussions about trigger-heights or combustible cladding.

Chris Pateman, 16 July 2020

Yes; ban barbeques in/on domestic premises but there is also a need to remind some involved in the various aspects of design of the basic ‘functional requirements’ principles of buildings. It is no good just concentrating on one aspect of a building in isolation; how the multiplicity of building elements will perform together when occupied by a variety of people needs to be under consideration all the time.

Janet Wood, 19 July 2020

Leave a Reply