Opinion

End the delusion of competitive contracting

Story for CM? Get in touch via email: [email protected]

Comments

  1. Chris Blythe has it exactly right. However, how do the people at the top get these highly responsible positions when, many if not all are not construction trained, qualified or professional enough to understand the industry. They all appear to be accountants!!

  2. I don’t entirely agree here. Undoubtedly change is needed across our industry on many fronts. The Farmer Report “Modernise or Die” from the Construction Leadership Council paints a very stark future for the industry within 10 years. It is within this window that we must make substantive change or face extinction.
    Whilst “Government” remains the largest composite client, it represents only around 25% of construction spend now, so their influence is limited to a select supply chain. So an appeal to “Government” I think is delusional. Administrations change, agendas change like a straw in the wind.
    We have to take responsibility to fix this ourselves for ourselves. The problem is we are so fragmented. So who speaks for our industry? The CIOB? CLC? CE? CIC? RIBA? RICS? IET? ICE? CPA? and so on. A plethora of organisations each with their own view and agendas. Few are willing to set aside parochial ambitions and work across the industry in real collaboration. Too many will join the race to the bottom in an apparent attempt at survival which in the long run just leads to extinction also.
    The threats facing our industry are very real now on a lot of fronts and few in leadership positions seem to really grasp this. The move to a data driven industry and digital transformation is going to shake a lot of trees to their roots, and will act as a catalyst for evolutionary change. The writing I believe is truly on the wall here. When a Google, Apple, or Amazon enters our industry shortly in a big way soon, they will do the equivalent of what iTunes, Amazon or Uber, did for music, retail and taxis. I think only then will people will sit up and take notice. But of course by then it will be too late for many organisations and businesses, and the race to innovate will be lost. Maybe we need another working party…….I’m joking of course.

  3. Firstly, I feel aggrieved for the majority of the industry that it has taken the collapse of only one (albeit a big one) “contractor” to bring so much sense to the fore. For decades we have seen the decimation of the medium sized contractors that have been trading for 30+ years and built their business and reputations on being “real constructors” (see Colin Hardings article in this same edition). Nevertheless, we are at least seeing some true and meaningful comments as a result and this can only be commended.

    “Competitive contracting is a mug’s game” everyone knows this, contractors, clients, their agents, their agents agents, etc. However, despite how badly it’s working, it is still working and that is the problem. We don’t have those individuals in the industry any longer that have the power and influence to make the step change to a whole brand new world. Thirty years ago we had PQSs that did weald such power and influence but over the last three decades even the RICS has reduced the PQS role to merely a desk jockey (probably ruffled a few feathers with that). PQSs, architects and constructors have all been so fractured into so-called specialisms that no single person or body has the strength to make a change.

    The article, however, petered out with a whimper. To make such a bold introduction and then use the grande finale to simply state that it’s got to be led by the government is wrong and feeble. (Sorry Chris).

    We need the CIOB to take the lead, we need the CIOB to speak to major client groups, to collaborate with the RICS, RIBA, ICE and the plethora of other representative organisations, to bring about this change. Currently, the industry still has the experienced (us old uns) people that remember when you dealt with a handful of white collar people and the contractor had his own workforce of joiners, bricklayers, plasterers, painters. More importantly when you had clients and their agents who collaborated in getting projects delivered. Call upon this experience to help bring about a change otherwise we are all doomed!

  4. I would take slight issue. I dont think “competitive contracting” is the problem, it is competitive FIXED-PRICE contracting.

    Fixed prices drive a whole host of undesirable behavioirs, and underpin most, if not all the symptoms identified by the various working parties.

    The sad thing is driving for fixed prices does not lead to the lowest cost for the client.

    There are much better ways to contract for a project (project alliances/IPD), and if this is not resulting in lower cost, faster, and better projects, it isn’t being done right!

  5. I can understand why politicians like to use headline grabbing terms like ‘delusional’, but I’m not sure how beneficial it is for industry insiders to repeat this; effectively throwing stones within their own green house. Yes, professionalism is hard to define, but name calling isn’t a great starting point nor setting a good example.

    Without question there were massive issues in the Carillion board room and I’m there are similar issues up and down the country throughout the construction industry and others. I don’t think there is anybody in the industry who would disagree. I’m not sure it is the responsibility of the government to remedy this.

    The Grenfell disaster, collapse of Carillion and the housing crisis has put the industry in the spotlight, again.

    If any more of our industry leaders would like to come forward with tangible recommendations following the great report by Mark Farmer, [Modernise or Die] please do so.

    Sorry Chris, but I didn’t find your article at all useful.

  6. It is partly a culture of fear, partly inadequate training (too many graduates too few indentured staff) and corporate amnesia.

  7. I have to agree with Chris on this. Due diligence, what does it actually mean anymore? Is a due diligence model fit for purpose? People are operating on such low margins it actually becomes unhealthy for industry and business, great for the customer of course but with it comes this operating risk. And yes delusional is exactly the right word to use. So at what point did Sir John Egan’s partnering principles decide to leave the room in all this? My heart goes out to all the young operatives who aspire to make themselves professional in our chosen field and who have young families and mortgages. Is this the environment and the playing field we have to work in, what’s really really sickening is that top executives were selling their shares in bulk and in advance of the crash. It just smacks of unethical and immoral behaviour.

  8. I fully agree with Chris Blythe. He went to the core of the problem and highlighted it.
    I would like to add few points for the philosophy and meaning for construction. Construction is the oldest historical trade that is based on craftsmanship, skills and honesty in accomplishing the job.
    With the rise of engineering education in the past 300 years, it turned to be the industry/trade that reflected the growth and development. The companies were classified between small, medium and large. Companies were prequalified and vetted before participating in any tender against their technical, financial and manpower capabilities. The employment was not an issue at this time since the construction team age ranged from 25 to 70 years old.
    Since the wake of 2000 and afterwards, the mentality has changed. The small and medium companies started to disappear. New Conglomerate Corporates started to swallow the small and medium with more third party supply chain mentality to replace the engineering/innovation mentality. Employment for construction nowadays became blurry and not clear like before. There is no shortage of skills.

  9. Having given over 40 years to this industry – and I know I’m not alone here – not sure it’s very helpful to label us as mugs!

Comments are closed.

Latest articles in Opinion