Chartered Institute of Building Magazine of the Chartered Institute of Building
CM NEWSLETTER

HMRC bogus self-employment crackdown working

HM Revenue & Customs’ crackdown on bogus self-employed construction workers is paying dividends with revenues falling from tax investigations. Revenue fell 34% last year to £102m, down from £154.2m in 2015.

According to national group of accountants, UHY Hacker Young, this is the lowest level since 2012

and that construction workers converting from self-employed to PAYE is a key driver of HMRC’s yield from investigations into the sector falling so dramatically.

The industry has been a particular target in the past few years, especially surrounding the area of  “disguised employment”, where workers classed as self-employed are treated effectively as employees by construction companies. 

UHY Hacker Young said the recent clampdown may have encouraged more construction companies to convert workers to PAYE to avoid becoming a victim of HMRC’s crackdown on the sector.

A self-employed worker often pays less tax than someone who is on the books of a business as an employee due to tax-free allowances for expenses, while companies are not required to pay costs such as national insurance.

Roy Maugham, tax partner at UHY Hacker Young, said: “The construction industry seems to be getting the message after years of being targeted by the revenue.

“HMRC has long seen much of the self-employment in the sector as simply an artificial way to cut costs. Companies could now have decided to avoid the chance of fines and lengthy investigations by ensuring more workers are paid through PAYE.

“Construction has traditionally had a far higher proportion of self-employed and contracted workers because of its project-by-project nature.

“Moving from job to job also means paperwork errors are far more likely from both the business and the individual.”

He added: “Despite the fall in yield last year, HMRC has been extremely successful in increasing their total revenues as a result of construction industry investigations and have showed no indication of easing the pressure on the industry yet.”

Comments

I'd report the firm of architects in London to HMRC that had me working as 'self-employed' for over four years in their office, but I'd likely just end up fined myself.

Not worth it.

It does stick in the throat though, that they pocketed employers NI payments for ski holidays etc., when at the end I had to find another job (outside the UK) as I couldn't afford being underpaid anymore!

  • 17th Feb 2017, at 03:49 PM
  • Kale

Leave a comment

News

25 May 2017 Fire investigations uncover the cost and scale of poor workmanship

25 May 2017 Build UK works towards single safety assessment

25 May 2017 Skanska names new executive vice president

25 May 2017 ITV submits plans for new South Bank HQ

25 May 2017 Cooling system for Qatar 2022 stadium revealed

25 May 2017 VIDEO: First phase of Wimbledon's No.1 Court project completed

25 May 2017 Arup attacked by 'ransomware' in Hong Kong

23 May 2017 Reader panel's thoughts on the general election

23 May 2017 New procurement method to trial at Derby Silk Mill

23 May 2017 Housing associations' output up 13% last year

23 May 2017 Wates promotes sustainable innovations again

23 May 2017 The world's five most important mega-projects

23 May 2017 Chris Blythe picks up leading membership award

22 May 2017 General election: What policies will win construction's vote?

22 May 2017 Three company directors jailed for manslaughter

22 May 2017 Qatar 2022 workers still suffering abuse, says Amnesty

22 May 2017 L&G makes senior hires to boost offsite operation

22 May 2017 Sky Fence stops drones flying over prison

21 May 2017 CDM 2015 reforms fail to hit home, reveals survey

18 May 2017 Wates to revamp Goldfinger's Brutalist tower