San Francisco tower sinking 2 inches a year
As lines form in a major legal battle over a sinking and tilting luxury tower in San Francisco, the European Space Agency (ESA) has waded in by saying its satellite images show the building is experiencing vertical subsidence of nearly 2 inches each year.
Data from the ESA’s Sentinel-1 satellites acquired between 22 February 2015 and 20 September 2016 show that the controversial Millennium Tower is sinking by about 40mm (1.57 inches) a year in the “line of sight” – that is, the direction that the satellite is “looking” at the building – which the ESA said translates into a vertical subsidence of almost 50mm (1.96 inches) a year, assuming no tilting.
For more international stories visit the CIOB’s global construction website GCR
The ESA, working with Norwegian scientists, hoped to demonstrate the value of the technology as a way of monitoring land deformation, but it is commenting on a matter that is the subject of multi-directional and potentially high-stakes legal battle.
Its revelation followed a lawsuit filed earlier this month by San Francisco’s City Attorney against the tower’s developer, alleging the developer knew the 58-storey building was sinking further and faster than expected, but did not tell potential home buyers as required by law.
The issue came to a head in August after it emerged that the luxury apartment building at 301 Mission Street had sunk 16 inches since it was finished in 2008, and was leaning, according to reports, by as much as 7.6 inches off the vertical at the tower’s top.
The City Attorney’s Office claims the developer, Mission Street Development LLC, knew by February 2009, before any units were sold, that six inches was the maximum amount of settlement predicted for the tower by the project’s geotechnical engineer, but that by the time the tower was completed in or around February 2008, it had already settled almost 6 inches.
A year later, by February 2009, the Tower had settled 8.3 inches, alleged the City Attorney, Dennis Herrera.
“We are not going to sit by and allow a developer – or anyone else – to enrich themselves at the expensive of others by hiding crucial information that they’re required by law to disclose,” Herrera said. “That gave the developer an unfair advantage against competitors, and it cheated homebuyers out of information they needed to make an informed decision.”
He added: “Before they had sold a single condo, Mission Street Development LLC knew their building had sunk more than it was supposed to in its lifetime – and that it was still sinking. Yet they didn’t tell the home buyers as they’re required to do so under the law. It’s that simple.”
The developer, Mission Street Development LLC, disagrees.
A spokesman told the New York Times that Herrera’s allegations had “no merit”, and repeated the developer’s previous claim that the tower’s subsidence was caused by de-watering from a major excavation at a neighbouring construction site, where the city’s Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA) is constructing a large transit hub.
Read the rest of the article at GCR