Chartered Institute of Building Magazine of the Chartered Institute of Building
CM NEWSLETTER
  • 12 Feb 2017
  • 0 comments

Headsets, caves, AR and VR - what's the reality for construction?

Construction is increasingly turning to virtual reality and augmented reality, says Dr Dragana Nikolic, lecturer in digital architecture at the University of Reading. But what’s best for your project?

A Daqri helmet

A recent study predicted the use of virtual reality and augmented reality among CAD users will increase 140% over the next five years. Are we on the brink of another digital revolution?

There is a definite upward trajectory of firms adopting immersive technology for tasks such as design reviews and for making more effective design decisions, it’s pushing them to engage in a different kind of conversation.

However, the industry is in the early stages of exploring and fully understanding how to use immersive reality and it is a long way from being standard practice. It’s still an add-on rather than at the core of working practice.

Headsets such as Oculus Rift, HTC Vive and Hololens have been grabbing the headlines, but which is best for construction?

In my view, HTC Vive offers a much-improved user experience compared to the earlier releases of Oculus Rift developers’ kit. The industry has really latched on to HTC Vive, based on its ability to integrate interaction devices and with a compelling immersive graphical experience.

However, assessing the best VR solution should really be about finding the right tech/task fit, based on the specific use case. A key question is how the user wants to interact with information. VR headsets offer complete immersion, with a 360-degree view and a high level of visual fidelity. AR does not require the same level of immersion and instead offers access to digital information overlaid onto a view of the real world.

AR can be run on an integrated headset, such as Daqri Smart Vision, or Hololens, as well as on smart phones or tablets, and that integration with existing gear arguably gives it the edge on construction sites.

Companies such as Igloo Vision and Soluis install projection-based environments, or “caves”, in offices where teams of people can experience a model together. Are there advantages to that approach?

It has its place for certain tasks. We often see project team members become instantly more engaged with a model and when talking to other team members about it, in a cave. A dynamic discussion is created by the environment – people walk to information, point to objects in the model, use tools to demonstrate, or measure things, they ask questions and come up with alternatives.

People tend to discuss and question information a lot more when viewing it collectively in a cave-like VR environment compared to more traditional design reviews using PDF drawings, or 3D rendered images of the model.

The industry is in the early stages of exploring and fully understanding how to use immersive reality and it is a long way from being standard practice. It's still an add-on rather than at the core of working practice.

Dr Dragana Nikolic

What are the limitations of these technologies?

All have a few glitches that prevent them from wider implementation. AR still has issues mapping 3D geometry and data over reality. If you want to have users walking around a site wearing AR goggles, it requires real-time updating, which means faster processing and the use of sensors, markers and other gear to map the environment.

VR caves have space constraints, there are limitations on where an environment can be placed and how easy it is to bring people to it. VR eyewear gives you the freedom to view a model anywhere at any time, without being tied to the physical environment.

More people are now leaning towards the headset-based approach which is perceived as more portable, and cheaper, despite the clear drawback of limiting the number of people who can engage in a review of the model.

Will using VR speed up design?

Yes, studies carried out a few years ago showed an increase in the number of problems that could be defined with the model, or the design, by interacting with an immersive environment, compared to using drawings.

What will the technology be capable of in 10 years?

I’m hoping it will be a lot more present, with many leaders in the industry starting to use it, that should have a “pull” effect on other players wanting to stay ahead of the game.

One can only imagine how the technology will have improved by 2025, given the pace at which new gear is released every year. Manufacturers will get rid of cables and reduce the clunkiness of headsets to make the technology more invisible to the user, therefore it will interfere less with their experience.

Dr Dragana Nikolic was talking to Stephen Cousins

This article first appeared on CM’s sister site BIM+

Leave a comment

Agenda

14 February 2017 Interview: BAM Construct's Graham Cash

12 February 2017 Headsets, caves, AR and VR - what's the reality for construction?

07 February 2017 Developer special: CM interviews the clients

05 February 2017 Developer special: What clients want from supply chain

05 February 2017 HB Reavis CEO exclusive interview - why Brexit is a blip

25 January 2017 Taking the BIM plunge pays off for small practice

05 January 2017 Meet the industry's stress busters

02 January 2017 Construction technology for 2017 and beyond

08 November 2016 What's happening to our quality control?

03 November 2016 Technical talking at BIM round table

03 November 2016 Think you're recruiting fairly? Well think again

18 October 2016 Infrastructure, BIM and the love of data

11 October 2016 CMYA 2016: How Paul Marlow came top of the class

29 September 2016 A year on, is the Modern Slavery Act working?

18 September 2016 Expert opinion deeply divided on case for Hinkley nuclear

06 September 2016 So where's the evidence for BIM's benefits?

22 August 2016 Why are we going backwards on the gender issue?

03 July 2016 New CIOB president Paul Nash - View from the top

01 July 2016 Slavery: Breaking the chains

01 July 2016 Construction's productivity conundrum